The centerpiece |
Josh Beckett’s value is a little harder to pin down. He has
put up an awful ERA of 5.23, but his peripherals aren’t quite that bad, and
last year he was pretty good. Lets assume his true talent level is above what
he’s performing now, and about that of a 3 WAR pitcher. He will likely replace
Joe Blanton who has actually been pretty similar to Beckett this season in that
he has an ERA over 5, but peripherals that are a good bit better. Blanton
however, doesn’t have the same track record as Beckett, so lets be conservative
and call him a 1.5 WAR win player. If it were Blanton who Beckett replaces,
this would give the Dodgers a 1.5 WAR upgrade. (By our rough measures.) Just
tonight however, Chad Billingsley went down with an apparent elbow injury. The
severity is not yet known, but if it is Billingsley that Beckett has to
replace, then the Dodgers would probably lose about a win over a full season.
There isn’t a full left though, only 36 games for both the
Dodgers and the Giants. The Giants have a three game lead now, and
coolstandings.com projects the Giants to win the division by 4.5 games. Using
the coolstandings projections and adjusting the Dodgers upgrades yesterday to
36 games versus a full season, the Dodgers would be projected lose the division
by about 3 games – exactly where they are now. Of course, anything could
happen. The Giants could lose every game next week or the Dodgers could win
every game next week and throw this all off, but for now, the Giants are still
the comfortable favorites in the NL West.
The Dodgers can’t have been making this trade looking only
at one season though. They agreed to take on over $250 million in salary, with
almost half of that belonging to Carl Crawford who is having Tommy John surgery
and won’t even play at all this year. However, while this move definitely
improves the quality of the Dodgers roster, it’s hard to see how it improves it
by over $250 million. Both Beckett and Crawford are overpaid, and Gonzalez at
best is a market value contract.
It’s confusing as to why if the Dodgers have all this money
to spend, they chose to acquire players on bad contracts and part with two of
their top prospects, De La Rosa and Webster. They could have easily waited
until free agency this year and next year (since the trade wasn’t a win now
move anyway) to spend that money on more talented guys who are worth their
contracts. The new ownership has deep pockets been looking to make a big
splash, but if acquiring these three guys is it, then the Dodgers have spent
their newly acquired financial strength fairly poorly.
No comments:
Post a Comment